[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logical formalisms
- To: "The Van Til List" <vantil-list@XC.Org>
- Subject: Re: Logical formalisms
- From: "James Anderson" <JamesAnderson@XC.Org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 09:40:28 +0100
- In-reply-to: <LYR230528-27022-1999.07.28-19.13.07--jamesanderson#xc.org@XC.Org>
- Organization: University of Edinburgh
- Priority: normal
- References: <LYR231513-26955-1999.07.28-18.01.52--david.byron#yale.edu@ XC.Org>
- Reply-to: "The Van Til List" <vantil-list@XC.Org>
Hi David,
On 28 Jul 99, at 22:13, David Byron wrote:
> In classical logic, presuppositions are trivial and wimpy.
I'm sure I ought to know this by now, but -- why is this so?
Cheers,
James
---
You are currently subscribed to vantil-list as: jamesanderson@xc.org